VTI or VOO - which one to be 30-50% of my net worth?
I am 38 years old. I have around 400K in savings. Live on rent. Not interested in buying a house right now. I am not sure I can afford anything that I like. Or even commit to a place for 20 years right now
17
6
1 month ago by seanhughes
16 Reply

Go for VOO (S&P 500). Do not go for VTI (total market/all companies)

S&P 500 includes all the relevant companies (500 is a pretty big number) in the market. Beyond the S&P 500, its some small caps. Too speculative and risky and not necessarily higher returns. In fact, as you can see in image - they are a drag on returns.
28
5
1 month ago by coreykelly

Yes, the small caps in VTI are not really exciting growth companies. They are has-beens. Companies that could not make it.

The exciting small caps are all private in venture capital or PE territory. At that small market cap - $1-2B, companies do not really go public these days. These are the small caps who could not make it big or the ones who were big at some point in their life. Sad companies.
0
0
1 month ago by hollyrussell

Your net worth is irrelevant here. VTI is an inferior index to track against. It includes "random" small companies.

Your age would have been a factor had you brought up Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) or some niche or something volatile. Both VOO and VTI are meant for conservative investing with VTI just being inferior.
3
0
1 month ago by brianmitchell

Which companies are in VTI but not in VOO?
0
0
1 month ago by jenniferparker

In terms of numbers - there are a lot. VTI has around 3500 companies compared to 500 in VOO/S&P 500. So 3000 more companies in VTI. But

1. Market cap of S&P 500 (VOO) - 52T
2. VTI (based on CRSP total market index) - 56T

So an additional 3000 companies at 4T total additional market cap.
So on average these companies are approx 1.3B in market cap each. Exceptionally small caps.

Avoid VTI
5
1
1 month ago by alejandrosilva

Not worth finding out the answer. And I suspect you will never have an answer. Both are extremely similar.

VOO 3 year IRR is 13.1%
VTI 3 year IRR is 12.3%

You will be fine with both
8
0
1 month ago by minhtran

My problem with total market, as its been mentioned above, is that it is an inferior product under all conditions and you are giving up almost 1% annual returns for nothing.
4
3
1 month ago by rebeccaphillips

You are giving up the extra 0.8% for getting those small caps. You might get higher returns if some of them become mega caps.
0
2
1 month ago by kellystewart

That is incorrect.
When smallcaps become larger, they end up becoming a part of S&P 500 as they reach mid scale. In simplified terms - when a small company becomes bigger than the 500th company of S&P500 - it joins VOO (S&P500) (I have oversimplified but this is largely the principle)
2
0
1 month ago by ashleywilliams

Dont do either of these 2. Buy a Nasdaq 100 tracking index like QQQ. These are the stable companies of today.
11
4
1 month ago by hanachoi

I agree. I know Nasdaq 100 is not the primary "stable" index for people because they tend to think more diversity is better. So "total market" > S&P 500 > Nasdaq 100. But these are the 100 companies moving the economy. And 100 is diverse enough.
0
0
1 month ago by minakim

Nasdaq 100 is too volatile to be 30-50% of net worth. The up/down movements will be 2-3x daily.
0
0
1 month ago by anhpham

Why not consider VT? (Not VTI) - Its the Vanguard total world stock index. US is not the only market. You can have a more balanced portfolio.
0
0
1 month ago by rikuyamamoto

Take SPLG over VOO. Its cheaper - expense ratio is 0.02% and VOO is 0.03%
0
0
1 month ago by alejandrosilva

Counting pennies. Vanguard is the king of index funds. No reason to buy anything else for 0.01% unless you are putting $1billion
0
0
1 month ago by brandonwilson

Both are literally tracking the same index. And State Street/SPDR is not some mom and pop
0
0
1 month ago by jeremygray